quietvoice wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 7:28 pm
https://old.bitchute.com/video/Vc2r0YIy5QAV/
Jewish Power and Facts About the Jews, July 3, 2024
17 minutes
The case against the New World Order
- quietvoice
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:56 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
- quietvoice
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:56 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
*
Nuclear?!!! LOL. Another scam.
- quietvoice
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:56 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
He's an imposter.Fulgurator wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 8:52 pm
The speed of light in radio waves is 300,000,000 meters per second. That's the speed of light. So far, there seems no indication the speed of light can be surpassed. Not that it bothered Einstein if some day another scientist came up with an alternative to relativity and light as a max factor. It hasn't yet happened so we still have the speed of light as a limit.
In space, even at the speed of light we have a delay so from Vega to the earth you need maybe 20 years for a beam to reach us. If you could transmit a radio wave it would also need 20 odd years. So time and velocity are governed by laws and that was Einstein's field.
I doubt there are any scientists that come anywhere near Einstein today. Elon Musk isn't even close. The maths Einstein used was mind boggling.
- quietvoice
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:56 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
LOL.
Hey, they could not even "defend" themselves from some "para-gliders" last October 7th.
It's a joke, David.
I looked at your cute video. Now, are you going to look at my cute video?
-
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:12 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
The question remains simple enough. If Einstein is wrong on the theory of relativity. prove it. You are free to submit your arguments to any physics department in your country. It goes beyond just opinion. however. You will need to quote sources and mathematical calculations and you'll need to prove how the accepted speed of light can be surpassed. We're all ears.
- quietvoice
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:56 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
'Fulgurator wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 7:11 pm If Einstein is wrong on the theory of relativity. prove it.
I said that he is a fraud, an imposter. He is not this smart person that the narrative makes him out to be. He can steal ideas like the best of (((them))).
And E=mc^2 does not make a lick of sense.
-
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:12 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
Opinion of personality isn't what's at issue. You claim Einstein is wrong so we're entitled hear your future efforts to prove "why" his theory is wrong.quietvoice wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 7:26 pm'Fulgurator wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 7:11 pm If Einstein is wrong on the theory of relativity. prove it.
I said that he is a fraud, an imposter. He is not this smart person that the narrative makes him out to be. He can steal ideas like the best of (((them))).
And E=mc^2 does not make a lick of sense.
And while we're at it, the poincare conjecture was recently solved by an impoverished Jewish mathematician who declined a million dollar cash prize. So, a future project for you is to challenge Perelman as well, since so far nobody has been able to disprove his calculations:
"In 1994, he proved the soul conjecture in Riemannian geometry, which had been an open problem for the previous 20 years. In 2002 and 2003, he developed new techniques in the analysis of Ricci flow, and proved the Poincaré conjecture and Thurston's geometrization conjecture, the former of which had been a famous open problem in mathematics for the past century. The full details of Perelman's work were filled in and explained by various authors over the following several years.
In August 2006, Perelman was offered the Fields Medal[1] for "his contributions to geometry and his revolutionary insights into the analytical and geometric structure of the Ricci flow", but he declined the award, stating: "I'm not interested in money or fame; "
-
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:12 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
Maybe Candid could get through and might have more patience with Quiet Voice. Or former member Richard who seemed to handle Q.V. better than the rest of us.
Re: The case against the New World Order
Nah. Neither the time nor the patience for someone who can write off entire groups of people, almost all of whom she doesn't know and will never meet.Fulgurator wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 8:33 pm Maybe Candid could get through and might have more patience with Quiet Voice.
I think he knew when to call it quits.Or former member Richard who seemed to handle Q.V. better than the rest of us.
- quietvoice
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:56 pm
Re: The case against the New World Order
Might I implore YOU to do your research. It starts OUT with looking at the Organized International Jewery, where you will find that that is an absolute fact that these people predominate in the power structure of this world. Just start there.