Plato And Psychology

[Fulgurator]

How did the 1905 revolution differ from 1917. Who were the NKVD? What did the SR party represent and what was their slogan?
Harder to copy and paste I think.
You can maybe explain to us too what the NEP policy of Lenin hoped to attain.
Knowledge of history differs from just pasting copied text. Please go ahead.

[quietvoice]

David, you are a target for extermination TODAY. Do you understand that?

[quietvoice]

We are living in Bolshevism 2.0.

[quietvoice]

For all of your 'knowledge' of history, it is made useless if you cannot connect the dots of what is going on TODAY.

Who taught you your history. Name names.

And P.S., that was not a copy and paste. I typed it out from a source. vvvv

RACIST
A term invented by this man Leon Trotsky (real name: Lev Bronstein) a MarXist Jew, to justify the destruction of European peoples and weaken their self-protective instincts and identity as a tribe. It is applied only to Europeans. It is used as a method of control when any European dares to see anything from his own point of view or try to protect himself or his people.

[quietvoice]

Your "copy and paste" rebuttal is not an argument. Never was.
You are the King of Deflection here at this forum, David Banner.

[quietvoice]

Here's a 'copy and paste' for you,

What is a deflection tactic?
Deflection is often used in arguments as a way to shift focus away from oneself and onto another person or issue. People commonly divert the pressure from themselves by changing the subject, pointing out someone else's flaws or presenting unrelated information to distract from the main issue at hand.

[quietvoice]

https://alt-market.us/britain-is-proof- ... -the-west/

Britain Is Proof: Globalists Plan To Use Migrants As A Mercenary Army Against The West
August 13, 2024



By Brandon Smith

Why do western officials insist on gaslighting the public on illegal border crossings? Why do they attempt to destroy anyone that publicly opposes mass immigration from the third world? The laws on the books support the public’s majority position on immigration – Come here legally or don’t come here at all. In Europe, the UK and the US polls show a majority of citizens want reductions in immigration and better border security. Yet, government officials, who often claim to be “protecting democracy,” brazenly ignore these majority concerns. Why?

For many years now I have offered a specific theory on the true agenda behind open border policies in western countries and I believe this theory answers most of questions surrounding illegal immigration.

The common claim within the Liberty Movement is that this is all part of the “Cloward-Piven Strategy”: A social engineering method which uses large scale relocation of migrants into a society in order to destabilize that nation. The goal is to import people with a incompatible or hostile ideology and, eventually, the target culture will break down and be forced to accept a new system of governance (i.e. from free markets and liberty to communism and slavery).

If western populations are unified in opposing the globalist ideology then the task of deconstruction becomes impossible for them. So, they simply destroy the west from within by introducing millions of people that will NEVER assimilate or unify.

......(continued)

.

[quietvoice]

From same article,

Meanwhile, Keir Starmer and other government officials have been meeting with Muslim groups to reassure them that the government is on their side.

[quietvoice]

/

https://old.bitchute.com/video/tdah4zhSV20C/
White People Defending Themselves Will Not Be Tolerated

/

[Candid]

What did you learn from any of the posts, Candid.

That you consider Fulgurator and me idiots.

Did you follow any links, consider any points, do research on any leads?

From your recommendations? No.