davidbanner99@ wrote:Where I differ with Candid is I get the feeling she spent a huge amount of time ...
While "the feeling" can sometimes be uncanny, it's still something that needs to be taken to the laboratory for confirmation. Do you agree?
I haven't picked up enough cynicism in Candid's evidence.
Reminds me of what Husband said about his schooldays. He's the kind of aspie who looks at a maths problem and sees the answer, so he'd whiz through an exam and be marked down because he hadn't shown how he worked it out.
Candid gets marked down by the Incredible Hulk. Oh well.
She often slaps the proofs so quickly you can tell they came straight off a conspiracy site.
"You can tell", huh? Is that another "feeling" you get? The speed with which they appeared on the Uncommon Forum shows whether I'd read/watched them or not? You might like to ponder the possibility that I have a list (some 45+ pages at last count) of links that have passed the Candid Test. Before I post any one of them I have to check a) that it's still there and b) that it's the one I intended to post, and hasn't been removed to make way for something saying the opposite.
YES! There's censorship! I thought you knew about that. And yes, the coronahoax has been my full-time job since October 2020 when I gave up "working from home" after six months of struggling with it, and knew I didn't want to be associated with a coronahoax-compliant organisation.
Conspiracy theorists in my view do not have this secret insight to reality.
And let me guess: you
do, and it's based on history books. I happen to agree with you about the Russia-Ukraine debacle, but I've also taken note of Boris's uncannily timed and highly conditional backdown. From when you first signed up I got the feeling you lived deep in the woods somewhere and rarely spoke to anyone. Dare I suggest you can't see the wood for the trees or that at the very least your "view" is compromised? At what point do you think one has enough evidence from trustworthy sources to know what's going on?
I just think she trusts like minded groups too much and never tried to rock their boat a little.
There's that "thinking" again. And it is, as you say "just" thinking.
I belong to three f2f groups, where we each have slightly different takes on what's going on and what if anything we can do about it... otherwise what would be the point of meeting?
It's not my place to rock anyone's boat. I had our happy jab-haver muted for a while because I felt bad he'd been conned. Thread-starter theforsaken truly had no choice because of where he lives, but tokeless was under no such duress. His incapacity with the quote function meant too much of my valuable time trying to figure out what he was trying to say, and when I managed to work it out I found him spouting the coronahoax narrative.
We don't need tokeless to keep us informed about what almost all government departments are telling us, do we!
