Page 16 of 29
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 1:16 pm
by quietvoice
Candid wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2024 3:51 pm
ALL Jews want that?
-
I'll tell you what, Candid.
You find me a Jew who has publicly denounced the writing and speaking of his fellow Jews that write and speak of killing the goyim.
Please name at least one Jew who has done that or who is doing that . . . . . . . . . . I . . will . . wait . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 1:23 pm
by quietvoice
-
Opening line:
Why are people afraid of the facts about Jews?
.
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 1:33 pm
by quietvoice
"Anti-communism is anti-semitism."
The Jewish Voice, published in New York, January 1941(?), page 23.
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 1:54 pm
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:06 pm I wonder if Q.V. is aware how bitter and incoherent she sounds lately.
I wonder if David can point to an instance of incoherence.
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 2:58 pm
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:10 pm
Actually extreme anti semitism has been quoted as a symptom in pathological disorders but I don't know why that is.
Freud was a jew. Does that give you any hints about your statement?
I'm sure you will not connect the dots, as you have not shown any inclination to do so as yet.
What is your view on communism, David? Don't tell me about how old the ideology is, tell me if you like the ideology for yourself? Yes, no, indifferent, any comments at all.
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 7:51 am
by Candid
Why does quietvoice have such a Thing about Jews?
If you don't like 'em, just stay aware from them.
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 2:26 pm
by quietvoice
Candid wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 7:51 am
Why does quietvoice have such a Thing about Jews?
If you don't like 'em, just stay aware from them.
***away***
Sorry, we cannot. They run EVERY THING . . .
...why have you not noticed????????
quietvoice wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 1:23 pm
-
Opening line:
Why are people afraid of the facts about Jews?
.
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 2:27 pm
by quietvoice
Seriously, Candid, stay away from them? And you won't do a modicum of research about it? What does that say about YOU?
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 2:29 pm
by quietvoice
Re: The case against the New World Order
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 2:31 pm
by quietvoice
ScottRoberts (channelowner at bitchute.com)
They cry "WHY DO YOU BLAME ALL JEWS?" instead of being the ONE jew who at least tries to prove that it ISN'T-ALL-JEWS. Lol
Of course a good or simply an honest person would say a. "Yes, this is all very wrong, even though (as a Jew) I wish you were the one who was wrong"... so therefore b. "I am against it and will speak against it". But of course they never do. They just immediately go to the crying out in pain act and pretend to be mad that you are "generalizing and condemning them all" for the "actions of a few" (not that they will ever admit even that much - not when it comes to this), when all they really have to do is say "yep, it's wrong" (simple/easy) to prove that they aren't all in on it...or to at least NOT make our point for us (or raise some doubt/get us to give at least them the benefit of the doubt), as they attack the messenger and PROVE that they ARE in fact ALL in on it.
And it IS objectively wrong and it IS obviously their people, so why is it so hard for ANY of them to even say what we already know (that it is wrong to poison people... to poison EVERYONE) and what is obviously true?
I mean, it would be so easy to at least raise some doubt and give us reason to pause when it comes to condemning them all, but they NEVER do... and they ALWAYS attack and censor us instead, while crying out in pain the entire time.
They never give an inch and they always double down. And yes, that applies to ALL of them. Every last one. See: [show less]
Edited 3 hours ago
https://old.bitchute.com/video/Fuv8ClqQKTVu/