Page 18 of 29

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 12:33 pm
by quietvoice
Candid wrote: Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:48 pm
If I know any Jews at all, they've kept it dark.
Fair enough. But those who do know jews are telling you to be aware and are telling you things about their behaviors and such—what is it that is keeping you from learning about such things?

You may not have noticed specifically what are the results of their behavior, NO SHAME IN THAT, but then, like I said, others who are VERY AWARE of the situation are voicing it, and do you think that the proper response to their voices is willful ignorance, Candid?

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 12:41 pm
by quietvoice
Candid, who do you think is responsible for all of everything around us and our air and our water and our food and skin creams, toiletries, etc., being poisonous? Do you think that everything being poisonous happened organically? I do live in the U.S., and so I am necessarily speaking from my perspective here. Where you live, is your place devoid of everything having been poisoned? I doubt it, actually.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 12:46 pm
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: Tue Jul 09, 2024 8:35 pm I made the mistake of trying to debate this issue
You did no such thing. You ignored any and all informational links that I presented, and then went off on tangents in your typing things out. If you ever answered even one of my direct questions to you, David, I do not remember such an event. You are piss poor at "debating".

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 1:13 pm
by quietvoice
quietvoice wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 12:46 pm
Fulgurator wrote: Tue Jul 09, 2024 8:35 pm I made the mistake of trying to debate this issue
You did no such thing. You ignored any and all informational links that I presented, and then went off on tangents in your typing things out. If you ever answered even one of my direct questions to you, David, I do not remember such an event. You are piss poor at "debating".
What is there to debate? There is no debate to be had. Things are what they are, and you talking about debating whether or not 'they are' does not change that 'they are'.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:22 pm
by Fulgurator
Two possibilities here but one is hypothetical. These racial rants kicked off more recently so I wondered if they connect to the Palestinian conflict. I assumed Q.V. lives in the U.S.A. but states such as Michigan have huge numbers of Middle East immigrants. So, if Q.V. has Middle East roots or is religious, that explains a good deal. As Candid stated Q.V. has always been strange but, more recently, she's really pushed the boundaries.
The other explanation is what was referred earlier. Pathological obsession, fixation and anger. Rigid and dogmatic fixation and the external world shut out and closed off. By this stage even Candid will be aware there's no rational awareness in this thread at all.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:31 pm
by Fulgurator
"I do live in the U.S., and so I am necessarily speaking from my perspective here."

That suggests a few clues. "Living" in the U.S. and having a "perspective here" sounds odd to me. I mean, having a perspective is what we have as being different to the environment. If it happens to be the case you originate from the Middle East you ought to be open. Then, your being so upset over the war would at least make sense. It would be like Ukrainians venting about the Russians. As things stand, though, these huge rants have made no sense to me.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:56 pm
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:31 pm "I do live in the U.S., and so I am necessarily speaking from my perspective here."

That suggests a few clues. "Living" in the U.S. and having a "perspective here" sounds odd to me. I mean, having a perspective is what we have as being different to the environment. If it happens to be the case you originate from the Middle East you ought to be open. Then, your being so upset over the war would at least make sense. It would be like Ukrainians venting about the Russians. As things stand, though, these huge rants have made no sense to me.
What the motherfuck are you talking about? Are you drunk?

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:57 pm
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 8:22 pm Two possibilities here but one is hypothetical. These racial rants kicked off more recently so I wondered if they connect to the Palestinian conflict. I assumed Q.V. lives in the U.S.A. but states such as Michigan have huge numbers of Middle East immigrants. So, if Q.V. has Middle East roots or is religious, that explains a good deal. As Candid stated Q.V. has always been strange but, more recently, she's really pushed the boundaries.
The other explanation is what was referred earlier. Pathological obsession, fixation and anger. Rigid and dogmatic fixation and the external world shut out and closed off. By this stage even Candid will be aware there's no rational awareness in this thread at all.
WTF? ... you are one lost puppy.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 10:07 pm
by Fulgurator
It's a logical possibility suggested. Why all of a sudden do we get these rants specific to race? There's a war started in the Middle East and these rants seem to tie in with the outbreak of that conflict. If the anti Semitic rants stretched back to Uncommon forums, this would not be unusual but, as far as I know, it started recently. People who rant to the extent of the past postings are either highly religious or, having some kind of meltdown.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 10:24 pm
by Fulgurator
Mostly, it's a fact Judaism and Islam have always been in conflict. The USA has had millions of immigrants from the Middle East and, in particular, Michigan.

"So why has Michigan—and southeast Michigan in particular—continued to draw so many immigrants from the Arab world, creating one of the largest Arab communities outside the Middle East?"

It's admittedly a wild guess and I may be wrong but it could be Q.V. has roots in the Middle East and that would explain part of the issue. Not sure if Candid or anyone else agrees but it's a theory at least.