Page 20 of 29

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 1:57 am
by quietvoice
Mexicans are a certain people and have certain customs. If this report was about the Mexicans, then it would prove the crimes Mexicans are usually involved in, which is murder, robbery, and sexual assault. Illegal Immigration and drug trafficking is also a big problem. Whites and other races don't try to live in Mexico and try to change their laws or traditions, or live off welfare in their country. All nations do not flow into Mexico. Mexicans did not bring the Gospel to the world or have been a blessing to the world. Mexicans are not why the world has problems. They aren't the money lenders, law makers, propagandists, child traffickers and sacrificers, corporation owners, and movie and News media producers.
(con't.)

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 1:59 am
by quietvoice
Asians are a certain people with certain customs. Asians are actually quite low on crimes, because they are either peaceful meditating and civilized, or are hive-mind programmed government-controlled slaves under Communism. Whites and other races don't try to live in Asian countries, change their laws and traditions, or live off welfare in their countries. Asians did not bring the Gospel to the world or blessed the world. The Asians aren't the money lenders, law makers, propagandists, child traffikers and sacrificers, corporation owners, and movie and News media producers.
(con't.)

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:00 am
by quietvoice
Arabs are race-mixed descendants of Ishmael and have their traits and beliefs. They are many of the Illegal Immigrants invading Europe and America through the open border policies regulated by our politicians. Rape, especially of white women, is a very high statistic of Arabs, along with violence, terrorism, and suicide bombings, and a good percentage of Arabs approve of violence for religious ends. Whites and the other races don't try to live in the Middle East and change their laws and traditions, or live off welfare in their countries. The Arabs did not bring the Gospel to the world or have been a blessing to the world. They aren't the money lenders, law makers, propagandists, child traffickers and sacrificers, corporation owners, and movie and News media producers.
(con't.)

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:01 am
by quietvoice
Whites are an absolute minority of welfare recipients, just 27% of the total. There are more blacks and Hispanics on welfare than whites. Whites are an absolute minority of food stamp users, Medicaid, and public housing (HUD).

Now White people have certain traits as well. But we also are not the money lenders, law makers, propagandists, child traffickers and sacrificers, corporation owners, and movie and News media producers.
(con't.)

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:04 am
by quietvoice
All the races and non-white peoples try to live in America and the other white nations of Europe, and change our laws and traditions and our values, and live off our welfare system. All nations flow into America because America is the regathering place of all 12 tribes of Jacob Israel just as prophesied. White people brought the Gospel to the world and have been a blessing to the world. We fit all the marks of true Israel. We white people are numbered as the stars of the sky and the sand of the seashore. The Jews are not numbered as the stars or sand. We are a great and mighty nation. Israel is a small and dishonorable land and not even considered a nation. We have a new home and place of our own. The Jews still live in the cursed land of Jesus' spilled blood. We live in the islands and coasts of the earth. The Jews don't. We are many nations and are a company of nations of white kinsmen throughout Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. The Jews are just a small counterfeit nation that isn't even officially a nation, because God said they would never be a nation or have a place of their own. We were prophesied to colonize and spread abroad. When have the Jews ever colonized and spread abroad? The only spreading of the Jews is an infectious spreading of destroying white socieities. Our lands have great mineral and agricultural wealth. Israel does not. Jews are not farmers, and God cursed Cain from the earth which would not produce for him or his children. We are ignorant to our relationship to God and lost trace of our lineage until the great revealing comes. Why do you think we identify as transGentiles? It's the Jews that claim to be God's people and masquerade as God's people. We are the custodians of the Oracles of God. The Jews perverted the Oracles of God and turned the Laws of Moses into Talmudic Judaism. We carried the Gospel to all the world and are His witnesses. The Jews never brought the Gospel anywhere and they deny Christ. We are kind to the poor and set slaves free. The Jews are ruthless, merciless and enslave the world. We are the nations of Israel and have all the marks of true Israel. The Jews, and the other races, do not match a single mark.
(con't.)

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:07 am
by quietvoice
White people are the nation builders, innovators, and law abiders throughout history. As a whole, we are the most compassionate of all races. But we do bad things too. We are easily deceived, just like our mother Eve was. We fall for things that seem right, or seem to be good, but are in fact and in reality not good. The devil seemed good and right to Eve, quite a handsome devil, pleasant to the eye, and very enchanting, and look what happened.

Many of the things white people are blamed for are actually things the Jews did. Some examples are Slavery. The Jews owned the slave ships and brought the blacks over and have successfully changed history to demonize white people for slavery and oppression caused by the Jews. Crimes against humanity (when most of them are not done by actual white people). We are blamed for the atrocities against the Indians. We are blamed for the oppression of the other races, yet we have allowed the other races into our white countries with open arms, fed the world, brought civilization and sanitation, law and order, and they turned around and rent us.
(con't.)

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:09 am
by quietvoice
If you want more, continue at the posted link.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 8:55 pm
by Fulgurator
Have you ever considered doing something positive with your life, Q.V., rather than spend your days fixed to the internet, scoffing at people who accomplished far more than you probably ever will? These people you scoff at act superior towards, be they black or Jewish, seem to have impacted far better on the world than those like yourself who spew out toxic hate and negativity. You call Einstein a fraud but what have you contributed to science or the arts? Or Jimmi Hendrix or Muhammad Ali, or Brian Epstein who discovered the Beatles.
Stop blaming and scapegoating those you clearly envy and try living a real life. You come across here as sad and bitter.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 9:55 pm
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2024 8:55 pm Have you ever considered doing something positive with your life, Q.V., rather than spend your days fixed to the internet, scoffing at people who accomplished far more than you probably ever will? These people you scoff at act superior towards, be they black or Jewish, seem to have impacted far better on the world than those like yourself who spew out toxic hate and negativity. You call Einstein a fraud but what have you contributed to science or the arts? Or Jimmi Hendrix or Muhammad Ali, or Brian Epstein who discovered the Beatles.
Stop blaming and scapegoating those you clearly envy and try living a real life. You come across here as sad and bitter.
You are dense. That's not on me.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2024 12:31 am
by quietvoice
HARVARD MAGAZINE

The Browser | Open Book
Abolish the White Race

September-October 2002

This excerpt from When Race Becomes Real: Black and White Writers Confront Their Personal Histories, edited by Bernestine Singley, appeared in 2002 as part of Harvard Magazine’s coverage of recent books by Harvard affiliates. The excerpt concerns author Noel Ignatiev’s role in launching a journal “to chronicle and analyze the making, remaking, and unmaking of whiteness.”



"The good news is that there are now a host of writers and a growing number of courses and workshops designed to enlighten white people as to the real benefits and the great cost of their property in whiteness," writes former Harvard Law School professor Derrick Bell in his epilogue to When Race Becomes Real: Black and White Writers Confront Their Personal Histories, edited by Bernestine Singley, LL.M. '76 (Lawrence Hill Books, $26.95). Many of those engaged in this Herculean task are white, Bell notes, among them Noel Ignatiev, Ed.M. '85, Ph.D. '94, C.A.S. '95, author of How the Irish Became White and a fellow at the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute, who writes:



In the interests of survival, Afro-Americans have always studied whiteness. There is a long tradition among them that the white race is a peculiar sort of social formation, one that depends on its members' willingness to conform to the institutions and behavior patterns that reproduce it. By the early 1900s...it was becoming commonplace in the academy to speak of race, along with class and gender, as a social construct....

In addition to the notion of race as a social construct, [an old friend, John Garvey, and I] shared another, which we owed to the West Indian Marxist C.L.R. James: that ordinary Americans are drawn by the conditions of their lives in two opposite directions, one that mirrors and reproduces the present society of competition and exploitation, and another that points toward a new society based on freely associated activity. We believed that this internal antagonism played itself out as a civil war within the white mind, between the desire of whites to wall themselves off from black Americans and their desire to overcome the boundaries that kept them apart.
book cover

John and I decided that it was time to launch a journal to document that civil war. The result was Race Traitor, whose first issue appeared in the fall of 1992 with the slogan "Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity" on its cover. The aim was to chronicle and analyze the making, remaking, and unmaking of whiteness. My book on the Irish was the story of how people for whom whiteness had no meaning learned its rules and adapted their behavior to take advantage of them; Race Traitor was an attempt to run the film backwards, to explore how people who had been brought up as white might become unwhite....

The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Of course we expected bewilderment from people who still think of race as biology. We frequently get letters accusing us of being "racists," just like the KKK, and have even been called a "hate group." ...

Our standard response is to draw an analogy with anti-royalism: to oppose monarchy does not mean killing the king; it means getting rid of crowns, thrones, royal titles, etc....

Every group within white America has at one time or another advanced its particular and narrowly defined interests at the expense of black people as a race. That applies to labor unionists, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers, and white women. Race Traitor will not abandon its focus on whiteness, no matter how vehement the pleas and how virtuously oppressed those doing the pleading. The editors meant it when they replied to a reader, "Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed—not 'deconstructed' but destroyed."