Page 24 of 29

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:46 am
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:18 am To learn about Israel you could read Josephus who described the Jewish revolt against Rome. You could read Tacitus or even Lenin.
To learn about Israel. To what end? Will doing that change the facts of today? Will doing that change the former civilized society in which I grew up and is now destroyed, will doing that turn around the society in which I live for the better?
Probably, and most likely, if I were to go down that route that you propose, I'll have even more ammunition for my side, lol.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:49 am
by quietvoice
Fulgurator wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:24 am William Lind - that is not a source.
This is something that I saw within the last hour. Just was passing it along.

Define "source" in this context in which you and I are speaking.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:51 am
by quietvoice
quietvoice wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:49 am
Fulgurator wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:24 am William Lind - that is not a source.
This is something that I saw within the last hour. Just was passing it along.

Define "source" in this context in which you and I are speaking.
To me, David, all of reality is the source of information. Please proceed to define "source".

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:54 am
by quietvoice
David, I don't remember you answering my question to you about your thoughts and/or feelings on communism? Please share.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:59 am
by quietvoice
quietvoice wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 10:14 pm
Fulgurator wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2024 7:04 pmOpposing multicultural societies isn't racism.
It is EXACTLY racism. How is it not?
You are saying that each nation (race) can have their own territory. If that is not what you are saying, then what are you saying?

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 3:19 am
by quietvoice
quietvoice wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:49 am
Fulgurator wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:24 am William Lind - that is not a source.
This is something that I saw within the last hour. Just was passing it along.
No, I did not vet this, but the link provided for the video, a very smart older gentleman is going through the piece, and I just started listening to him do that.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:04 pm
by quietvoice
Image

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:08 pm
by quietvoice
δ

Note the similar set up that you and I have here, David.
You have a limited set of information from which you draw, and I have "my ability to independently research . . . with the most powerful informational tool in the history of mankind."

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:28 pm
by Fulgurator
"my ability to independently research . . . with the most powerful informational tool in the history of mankind."

What do you think happens to your body if you rely on machines such as e-skooters? Ever noticed how thin skooter users legs are? Same with the brain. Google saves you the need to think or work things out. It infantalises the brain and teaches users to make judgements via base emotions such as "likes". You are not using your own mind but just " liking" what you want to hear, while copying and pasting random texts. A twelve year old can do the same.To increase your logic ability you need to do hard maths and work things out for yourself. Then read credited books.

Re: The case against the New World Order

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:38 pm
by Fulgurator
This is one of my exam questions I tackled last year and kid's play to the maths Einstein did for hours each day. To work out these questions yourself develops your logic capacity.

1. Work out the resistive value of the load: R=84.8/.6
=141.3 ohms
2. Work out Z, where Z=Vsupply/load current
=240/.6
= 400 ohms
3. Work out Xc by (Z^2-R^2)^.5
=(160,000 - 19965.7)^.5
= 374 ohms

4. Now work out C with the original formula;
C=(1/374)/(2*3.14*50)
C= 8.5